<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romer on Curriculum Narrowing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/02/25/romer-on-curriculum-narrowing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/02/25/romer-on-curriculum-narrowing/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vital core</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/02/25/romer-on-curriculum-narrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>vital core</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/02/25/romer-on-curriculum-narrowing/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“We at ED in ’08 have  long advocated for more time for learning in America’s schools.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Crazy. Everyone thinks we can just &quot;add more time&quot; to a broken system to fix it. Insanity. I currently homeschool &lt;i&gt;half days&lt;/i&gt; yet run roughly 2-3 grades ahead. And don&#039;t tell me America couldn&#039;t teach like this; at $10k per student, teachers could teach 6 kids at out of their home and get paid about $50k, and produce a superior product. But of course, this would ruin the whole education scam, eh?

So I disagree that lack of time is the problem. Rather, it&#039;s a broken institutional system with a bad learning environment, one that treats every child as a clone. More time will merely lead to burnout. Typical ed solution.


Regarding the &lt;i&gt;teaching content IS teaching reading&lt;/i&gt; claim: why not turn this around? How about &quot;reading IS teaching content?&quot; I&#039;ve found reading good books about the Civil War has a much higher retension rate than mere memorizing names/dates/places from some dry &quot;history&quot; textbook. So I disagree, and believe one should master reading, vocabulary, and math first, and then practice these skills by becoming well read. The content comes naturally to the agressive reader.

It&#039;s hard to ignore the reality that many children are merely pushed forward in our schools based on age only, not subject mastery. If one can&#039;t read or do math well, learning via content becomes very painful to the slow learner and just doesn&#039;t happen. So the kid tunes out and drops out. Slower kids get lost in the &quot;content over reading&quot; system and fall further and further behind every year because they lack the core fundamentals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“We at ED in ’08 have  long advocated for more time for learning in America’s schools.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Crazy. Everyone thinks we can just &#8220;add more time&#8221; to a broken system to fix it. Insanity. I currently homeschool <i>half days</i> yet run roughly 2-3 grades ahead. And don&#8217;t tell me America couldn&#8217;t teach like this; at $10k per student, teachers could teach 6 kids at out of their home and get paid about $50k, and produce a superior product. But of course, this would ruin the whole education scam, eh?</p>
<p>So I disagree that lack of time is the problem. Rather, it&#8217;s a broken institutional system with a bad learning environment, one that treats every child as a clone. More time will merely lead to burnout. Typical ed solution.</p>
<p>Regarding the <i>teaching content IS teaching reading</i> claim: why not turn this around? How about &#8220;reading IS teaching content?&#8221; I&#8217;ve found reading good books about the Civil War has a much higher retension rate than mere memorizing names/dates/places from some dry &#8220;history&#8221; textbook. So I disagree, and believe one should master reading, vocabulary, and math first, and then practice these skills by becoming well read. The content comes naturally to the agressive reader.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to ignore the reality that many children are merely pushed forward in our schools based on age only, not subject mastery. If one can&#8217;t read or do math well, learning via content becomes very painful to the slow learner and just doesn&#8217;t happen. So the kid tunes out and drops out. Slower kids get lost in the &#8220;content over reading&#8221; system and fall further and further behind every year because they lack the core fundamentals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
