<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How About &#8220;Unacceptable&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:37:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>I find &quot;priority schools&quot; a bit hurtful, personally. It sounds neutral at first, until you realize it&#039;s a loaded term with a hierarchy looming behind it. I would go for &quot;deficiency-rich schools.&quot; After all, the greater the deficiency, the greater the potential improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find &#8220;priority schools&#8221; a bit hurtful, personally. It sounds neutral at first, until you realize it&#8217;s a loaded term with a hierarchy looming behind it. I would go for &#8220;deficiency-rich schools.&#8221; After all, the greater the deficiency, the greater the potential improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
