Archive for June 13th, 2008

It’s Gettin’ Hot in Here

Eduwonkette accepts David Brooks’ apology on behalf of Julian Bond, T. Berry Brazelton, Debbie Meier, Ted Sizer and a host of other “who have dedicated their lives to improving the lives of poor and minority children” and counts herself among (in Brooks’ unfortunate phrase) the status quo–those who signed on with the Economic Policy Institute’s “Broader, Bolder Approach to Education

I really do hate my permanent residence in the reality-based community, but at least half of the achievement gap that exists between black and white students – the fact that the average black 12th grader performs at about the 16th percentile of the white distribution (a gap of about 1 standard deviation)- cannot possibly be attributed to the K-12 schools.

Eduwonkette finds an unlikely ally at Flypaper, where Checker Finn is naming names, asking “what the likes of Joel Klein, Arne Duncan, Michelle Rhee, Kati Haycock, Joe Williams, and Andy Rotherham think they’re doing” by affiliating themselves with Al Sharpton, even while he agrees with many of principles espoused by the “National Education Reform Coalition.” Alexander Russo, spoiling for a fight as always, wonders why the education blogs “have spent so much time debating two ultimately unimportant documents put out by different education coalitions.”

Sorry, A-Rus, but this matters a lot. Sane, executable policy can only spring from a pragmatic consensus on expectations and accountability. Personally, I’m not ready to stand with either side because while I think the “Broader, Bolder” camp has nothing to apologize for in terms of accountability (making closing the achievement gap your life’s work is a funny preoccupation for the accountability-averse, no?) there would be value in a clear, unambiguous statement that accountability matters. Likewise the Klein-Sharpton gang are certainly right when they say that schools to “are doing what we have designed them to do over time” by protecting the interests of adults over children. But it’s simply wrong to suggest that if a child fails in school, someone in the school has dropped the ball.

One piece of the EEP statement of principles particularly irritates me. On the one hand, there’s a call to “create accountability for educational success at every level – at the system and school level, for teachers and principals, and for central office administrators.” A few lines later comes the “call on parents and students to demand more from their schools, but also to demand more from themselves.”

Aye, there’s the rub. I and others have spent years making exactly that call to parents and students. Sometimes the call is answered. Often it is not. Sometimes it can’t be. Want to call me unaccountable?

Them’s fightin’ words.

Don’t miss: Teacher John Thompson, who frequently graces this blog with his thoughtful, eloquent comments, has a great one on Eduwonk. Click here and scroll down.

And Obama?

While McCain dispatches Lisa Graham Keegan to talk to education reporters (see below), Timesman David Brooks accuses Obama of being all carrot, no stick on education. “He’s politically astute — giving everybody the impression he’s on their side — but substantively vague. Change just isn’t that easy.”

Brooks frames his column with the Times overly facile take that this week’s dueling ed reform manifestos boils down to warring camps within the Democratic party.  But regardless, it’s worth asking, as Brooks does, what Obama believes:

When you look at the actual proposals Obama offers, he’s doesn’t really address the core issues. He’s for the vast panoply of pre-K and after-school programs that most of us are for. But the crucial issues are: What do you do with teachers and administrators who are failing? How rigorously do you enforce accountability? Obama doesn’t engage the thorny, substantive matters that separate the two camps.

Obama’s education remarks “give the impression of a candidate who wants to be for big change without actually incurring the political costs inherent in that enterprise,” Brooks concludes.

McCain’s Education Platform Emerges

John McCain’s education major domo, Lisa Graham Keegan, held a Q&A with education reporters at the Fordham Foundation.  What news was made?  Michele McNeil of Education Week says McCain believes the NCLB law is “adequately funded,” and “while the senator is a big supporter of vouchers and private and public school choice, he does not support using Title I money for private school vouchers.”

The Washington Post was there too, and Maria Glod leads with support for using federal dollars for teacher merit pay and support for continued annual testing, but with more say for educators in how to fix struggling schools.  Fordham’s Petrilli sums up:  “To my ears, it sounds like a major departure from No Child Left Behind as we know it.”

The quote that sticks from Keegan:”The federal government cannot position itself continually as the bully in this….No more will we say that’s what 50 states are going to do, because he doesn’t believe that’s our best hope for improvement.”