<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Exceptional&#8221; Schools in Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/07/01/exceptional-schools-in-texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/07/01/exceptional-schools-in-texas/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:44:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/07/01/exceptional-schools-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=541#comment-4215</guid>
		<description>Are the students reading fiction 2 hours a night at home?  Until that happens, you can just forget improvement. 

It&#039;s all about the reading, stupid.  And if it isn&#039;t happening at home, and from the age of 4 on, on a daily basis and for long enough a period of time, nothing else the schools can do (except add 2 hours and have the students do their reading at school) is going to make any kind of sizable difference.  

The schools aren&#039;t failing the kids.  The PARENTS are failing their kids.

Duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the students reading fiction 2 hours a night at home?  Until that happens, you can just forget improvement. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about the reading, stupid.  And if it isn&#8217;t happening at home, and from the age of 4 on, on a daily basis and for long enough a period of time, nothing else the schools can do (except add 2 hours and have the students do their reading at school) is going to make any kind of sizable difference.  </p>
<p>The schools aren&#8217;t failing the kids.  The PARENTS are failing their kids.</p>
<p>Duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pondiscio</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/07/01/exceptional-schools-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-4214</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pondiscio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=541#comment-4214</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I follow your argument about redefining success as failure.  I have issues with the unintended consequences of our test-driven accountability culture. It narrows the curriculum to an unacceptable degree, most notably.  But I support the idea of a accountability in principle.  And from that it stands to reason that if a school can dismiss the performance of a particular subgroup from its accountability measures, it lowers the bar for that subgroup.  And isn&#039;t that how we got into this mess in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I follow your argument about redefining success as failure.  I have issues with the unintended consequences of our test-driven accountability culture. It narrows the curriculum to an unacceptable degree, most notably.  But I support the idea of a accountability in principle.  And from that it stands to reason that if a school can dismiss the performance of a particular subgroup from its accountability measures, it lowers the bar for that subgroup.  And isn&#8217;t that how we got into this mess in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill klimko</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/07/01/exceptional-schools-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-4213</link>
		<dc:creator>bill klimko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=541#comment-4213</guid>
		<description>So, the inverse is true in your argument. &quot;Redefining success as a failure&quot; is the way to go. Suppose that you had one demographic that pulled the school up? You are saying that this group should be discounted because they improved the school&#039;s rating and offset the rating of the non-performing groups. It sounds like the strange factoid that &quot;Smoking is the leading cause of statistics.&quot;

I teach in a Title 1 school in Texas, and would teach nowhere else. But I&#039;ve always wondered that if we redirected &quot;measurement money&quot; to actually improving curriculum, teacher training, and classroom supplies this argument would be even more pointless than it already is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the inverse is true in your argument. &#8220;Redefining success as a failure&#8221; is the way to go. Suppose that you had one demographic that pulled the school up? You are saying that this group should be discounted because they improved the school&#8217;s rating and offset the rating of the non-performing groups. It sounds like the strange factoid that &#8220;Smoking is the leading cause of statistics.&#8221;</p>
<p>I teach in a Title 1 school in Texas, and would teach nowhere else. But I&#8217;ve always wondered that if we redirected &#8220;measurement money&#8221; to actually improving curriculum, teacher training, and classroom supplies this argument would be even more pointless than it already is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
