Speaking of New Paternalism…

by Robert Pondiscio
September 12th, 2008

Jay Mathews of the Washington Post has decided that “No Excuses Schools” is a better moniker than “New Paternalism.”  You may recall, Mathews had issues with the title of David Whitman’s new book, Sweating the Small Stuff, about KIPP, et al., praising the author’s work and the schools profiled in his book.  But he found the subtitle, “Inner-City Schools and the New Paternalism,” off-putting and a PR disaster.  So he invited his legion of readers to come up with a better name. 

Uncle Jay was kind enough to cite my objection in his column, but my point remains: if we want to move the agenda forward for kids, we need to focus on the practices that make those schools successful. If that means acting in loco parentis–or as a loco parent–so be it.  Whatever it takes. Also as Corey Bower points out, “No Excuses Schools” implies the reason most schools are struggling “is because they’re making excuses, or allowing kids to make excuses.”  It ain’t necessarily so. 

Hmmm.  How about “ILP Schools?”

New Paternalism on Steroids

by Robert Pondiscio
September 12th, 2008

Companies in Alberta, Canada are being urged not to hire high school dropouts to encourage students to get their diploma. 

Alberta’s Education Minister Dave Hancock told the Calgary Chamber of Commerce yesterday that Alberta’s high school completion rate needs improvement. Business has a role to play in helping kids stay in school.  “You can help by refusing to hire anyone without a high school diploma,” Hancock said.

TFA=AOL? OMG!

by Robert Pondiscio
September 12th, 2008

A-Rus at This Week in Education wonders if alternative certification programs like Teach For America are becoming the “AOL of teacher preparation programs — once innovative, and for a time dominant, but now increasingly outmoded.”  He posts a picture of those once-ubiquitous AOL discs to drive home the point.

The cutting edge of teacher prep now seems to be the residency model popularized in Boston and other places, and heralded in a recent report cited by EdWeek (Urban Teacher Residencies Touted). The other reason is that people like Barack Obama are talking about residency programs, not alt cert. TFA has grown tremendously in recent years, and had a lot of Republican support. I’m not sure it will have a similarly privileged position in an Obama administration.

Wasn’t it just last night that both Obama and McCain were pledging to boost America’s commitment to national service?  McCain touted TFA by name from the stage at Columbia and Obama has put forth a plan for “universal voluntary citizen service.”  Aren’t we looking at a need for 2 million teachers in the next decade?  Aren’t lines of applicants still failing to form outside struggling schools? 

We needn’t lose sleep worrying about TFA’s decline.  Russo did make me feel nostalgic for the AOL discs, however.  I used them for coasters.

Stoopid

by Robert Pondiscio
September 11th, 2008

Is good spelling a sign of an educated person?  Or merely a formality fetishized by pedants?  A leading British academic believes it’s the latter and says we should stop worrying that “textmessage speak” is creeping into the language.

John Wells, president (irony of ironies) of Britain’s Spelling Society, tells London’s Daily Mail that the informal language of texts, emails and chat rooms is the “way forward.”  An Emeritus Professor of Phonetics at University College London, Wells says irregular spellings place an undue burden on schoolchildren. 

Let’s stop worrying if people sometimes spell “you” as “u”; “your” and “you’re” both as “ur”; and “whose” and “who’s” both as “whos”.  Nowadays we often see “light” written as “lite” and “through” as “thru”. Let’s not hold up our hands in horror – people should be able to use whichever spelling they prefer….’We should no longer fetishise the ability to sort out “their”, “there” and “they’re”. There are more important things to life.’

And apostrophes? A waste of time. Sack ‘em.  ”Have we really nothing better to do with our lives than fret about the apostrophe?” sez he.

Mommy and Me

by Robert Pondiscio
September 11th, 2008

Children who were most prepared for kindergarten in a San Francisco study tended to be older girls who attended preschool, had no special needs, and mothers who went to college, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. 

The mother’s education was the most closely aligned with a child’s readiness, trumping all other characteristics including family income, ethnicity and English language ability. The study didn’t address why these characteristics were associated with being ready for kindergarten, but only noted the connection.

Researchers who evaluated 447 of last year’s kindergartners across San Francisco schools found that while half lack at least some needed skills, 11 percent were deficient both academically and socially.  They also found that preschool experience was a common trait among kids who showed up ready to learn, the paper reports.

Welcome to the 188th Carnival of Education!

by Robert Pondiscio
September 10th, 2008

The Core Knowledge Blog is pleased to host the 188th edition of Carnival of Education!  A large and diverse cohort of edubloggers is on hand to offer the week’s best thinking and writing.   It’s a special event, but it’s still a school day, so we will be following our regular class schedule and the Core Knowledge curriculum.

History, Geography and Social Studies

Should a free education be unconditional? Tweenteacher asks, “If a child is showing early signs of being a threat to himself, to others, or simply in serious need of help that cannot be provided in a mainstream setting, should there not be regulations that designate that a parent, seek help for that child as a condition of their free education?”

To form strong school communities we need to champion clear values and virtues. The Marines, the Mormons and even the Hell’s Angels–and any other group that has members who really feel they belong–are clear about what they are about. That’s what Michael Umphrey is thinking about as he listens to a school consultant prattle on about “belonging” at The Good Place.

What’s the difference between teaching in Quebec and Teaching in Alberta?  About $30,000 according to Teacher Pay Scale Across Canada posted at Nucleus Learning.

California’s best and worst students “are likely to speak English as a second language,” writes Joanne Jacobs.  They either become bilingual superstars or Jose Average.

Chanman at Buckhorn Road continues to be amused at the education wonks “who just can’t seem to figure out why an achievement gap exists.”

What can we learn from teachers of a century ago?  Plenty.  Jon Ingram presents Learning from the past posted at Lessons Taught; Lessons Learnt.

Mark Montgomery presents Affirmative Action for Boys: The Moral Equivalent to Affirmative Action for Blacks and Latinos? at Great College Advice.

larry Ferlazzo presents The Best Resources For Hispanic Heritage Month posted at Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day….

Homeschooled 18-year-old Miss Amanda wonders why she would spend “13 years of my life being homeschooled, being kept away from the influence of the public school system, only to put myself into their higher education public school?”

100 Free Online Ivy League Courses you can take just for fun? Sounds too good to be true, but Alisa Miller at EduK8 says it’s true.

Language Arts

Stories and Speeches

Charlene has committed what would be considered to be criminal offences in the adult world, writes Old Andrew at Scenes From the Battleground. Yet she is seen as a perfectly suitable candidate to learn a subject she has actively resisted learning for several years, in an institution she has continually harmed.

What would be so bad about having kids wear uniforms? asks NYC Educator.  “They’re simple, they’d help us to identify intruders, and they look comfortable. Why should charters be able to require uniforms but not us?” Buen idea.

Why is it that kids have such a hard time copying things word for word or answering questions out of a book onto a separate sheet of paper? asks Mister Teacher at Learn Me Good.

Teacher Pat of Successful Teaching hopes to have the courage to do the right thing instead of the thing that will cause the least amount of controversy in One Bold Bird.

It’s Sweetheart Girl vs. Pinball Boy.  And it’s no contest.  Mrs. Bluebird presents The Premier Paper Passer posted at Bluebird’s Classroom

Poetry

“A good poem is a work of art, and the teacher who deliberately, for whatever reason, turns that art into drudgery will have to account to heaven for that sin,” opines Mamacita at Scheiss Weekly.  “Textbook editors who put bad poetry in a child’s textbook will be sorry, too.”

Limericks and haikus about things you’re no good at?  See Not So Artful At Athletics posted at MAD KANE’S HUMOR BLOG.

A person who demonstrates fidelity is loyal, consistent, committed, writes Teacher in a Strange Land’s Nancy Flanagan.  But when “fidelity coaches” are provided to schools purchasing whole-school reform packages, they’re not urging teachers to be committed to their students. They’re monitoring teachers’ willingness to dependably follow an agenda.

Reading

Crissy at Preschool Finder Blog taught Kindergarten for 8 years and kids left her class reading.  “How did I do that?  That question still puzzles me.  All we did was read, play with magnets, point to words, sing….all of these activities lay the foundation for becoming a reader.”

There are inherent difficulties being a male teacher in the early grades.  J.M. Holland at Lead from the Start hasn’t had a lot of problems with parents and issues of trust, “but I have had my share.”

PicktheBrain presents Reader’s Delight: A Search Engine for Free Online Books posted at Ace Online Schools.

Music and Fine Arts

D.B. Williams defends the fine and performing arts in education at An Outsiders’ Perspective.  “Art stimulates a child’s cognitive and affective domains, as well as their motor skills, which leads to learning, discovery, creativity and motivation,” he writes.

Photographing over 1,700 students convinces Carol Richtsmeier of Bellringers that organization is an overrated virtue.   But don’t try telling that to Ms. Teacher.  Disorganization is costing her the first two weeks of the school year.  Can I Teach Now? she asks.

It’s awesome to see a six year old’s bedroom decked out with pirate decor or ballerina themes, but Mathew Needleman isn’t sure classroom “themes” do much toward supporting the curriculum being taught in the rooms in which they are used.  Classroom Themes: Realia or Wallpaper is posted at Creating Lifelong Learners.

Mathematics

What if we went the Jack Welch route and fired the bottom ten percent of all teachers every year?  We would have to fire 320,000 teachers per year, that’s what.  That won’t work so Dave Saba offers Fixing Teacher Quality instead at Finding Excellent Teachers.

The idea that teachers should be held accountable for increasing “measured individual student learning rates” seems obvious, right?  But it ain’t ever that easy, writes Bill Ferriter at The Tempered Radical.

Add Travis A. Wittwer’s name to the list of teachers who don’t want to pay–sorry, incentivize–students with bribes rewards for doing well in school.  GRADE$$$ and TE$$$T $$$CORE$$$ is posted at Stories from School: Practice meets Policy.

It’s time to bring the college rankings business into the new millennium and smash the forest-destroying furry-animal-killing monopoly that is U.S. News, says Bob O’Hara.  He offers The Google College Rankings at The Collegiate Way.

Science

Charles Murray is not the first to make an intellectual determinism argument, and he won’t be the last. But neither science nor history is really on his side, writes Karin Chenoweth at Britannica Blog.

Junk science and common misconceptions and misrepresentations of science in the media and in public opinion, courtesy of Irradiatus who presents Current Headline News Useful for Freshman College Science Courses posted at biochemicalsoul.com.

Professional Learning Communities have jumped the shark, says The Science Goddess at What It’s Like on the Inside.

Jeremy Burman puts arguments against the use of drugs to treat children diagnosed with ADD/ADHD in context at Advances in the History of Psychology. 

Chaos, entropy, the laws of thermodynamics, and the New York City Department of Education combine a la Tom Stoppard as Woodlass presents A failed chancellorship, in scientific terms posted at Under Assault: Teaching in NYC.

Steve Spangler features Favorite Halloween Science Demos is posted at Steve Spangler’s Blog.

Next week’s Carnival will be hosted by Thomas J. West Music.  Class dismissed!

Why NCLB is MIA

by Robert Pondiscio
September 9th, 2008

Checker Finn noticed that the words “No Child Left Behind” never even crossed the lips of Obama or McCain in their convention acceptance speeches.

In the education sphere, that’s roughly equivalent to talking about America’s foreign and defense challenges without mentioning Iraq. NCLB is the 800-pound gorilla of federal K-12 education policy and the foremost topic of conversation whenever this domain is touched on. In fact, as I roam the land, it’s the only federal education issue that non-educators invariably ask about. Yet in their major campaign kick-off addresses, both wannabee presidents managed to talk about education without disclosing that they’re even aware of its existence.

NCLB is a “damaged brand,” Finn writes, even while the public still supports standards, assessment, and school accountability.  But the silence from the candidates has as much to do with “real and serious” internal schisms in each party, Finn says.  Democrats are split over the role of teachers’ unions, and if schools alone can boost performance, or if problems beyond schools’ control need to be addressed first. 

The GOP, too, faces a pair of big (and also overlapped) splits, both reverberating with past vs. present, of what might be called Reagan-era vs. Bush-era thinking about education priorities. One involves Uncle Sam’s role: forceful driver of reform or an undemanding source of dollars to states, districts and parents to do pretty much what they think best in the K-12 sphere. The other Republican schism is between supporters of school choice as the surest path to better education and advocates of standards, testing and results-based accountability, i.e. between reliance on the marketplace or on government-driven change.

The upshot: the less McCain and Obama say about NCLB the better. “Stick with the crowd pleasers today and save for tomorrow — some tomorrow after November 4 — any clear plans for what to do when statutory reality can no longer be avoided,” Finn concludes.

Matt Davis on Core Knowledge Reading Program

by Robert Pondiscio
September 9th, 2008

There’s a good, in-depth interview on ednews.org with Dr. Matt Davis, the head of the Core Knowledge Reading Program, which will be piloted in New York City this year.  He talks about the two major strands of the program: a unique phonics-based “Skills” strand, and a “Listening and Learning” strand that enables very young children to build up vocabulary and background knowledge, through read-alouds of classic literary selections, fairy tales and poems, as well as a non-fiction selelctions in history, science, art, and music.

“We think the two strands together will be a great one-two punch.  The Skills Strand should teach the students to decode fluently, while the Listening and Learning strand should help ensure that they have the breadth of background knowledge they will need to understand what the words they decode.”

Davis also makes a good, if little appreciated point about Core Knowledge in general.  “Although people have been slow to see this, it is a curriculum designed for social justice,” he notes. ”The well-off kids, the ones whose parents read to them, teach them about numbers and letters, take them to New York and Washington, DC in the summer, visit museums, listen to public radio, and so on – those kids are going to tend to soak up a lot of cultural literacy in the home environment, and they will be able to make sense of a lot of what they read. But other kids are not as fortunate.  These children need to get their cultural literacy in the schools. These are the children the Core Knowledge Foundation is looking to help, and they are also the children we are hoping to help with the reading program.”

All Work and No Play Makes Jack a Troubled Boy

by Robert Pondiscio
September 9th, 2008

What’s wrong with boys?  Last week we learned that parents of nearly one of every five U.S. boys have sought professional help about their sons’ emotional or behavioral problems.  Newsweek’s Peg Tyre thinks it has a lot to do with changing child rearing and education practices over the last ten years–overscheduling, instead of structured play.  Learning Mandarin in preschool instead of playing Duck, Duck, Goose.  Schools, says Tyre, have become increasingly terra incognita for boys

In many communities, elementary schools have become test-prep factories—where standardized testing begins in kindergarten and “teaching to the test” is considered a virtue. At the same time, recess is being pushed aside in order to provide extra time for reading and math drills. So is history and opportunities for hands-on activities—like science labs and art. Active play is increasingly frowned on—some schools have even banned recess and tag. In the wake of school shootings like the tragedy at Virginia Tech, kids who stretch out a pointer finger, bend their thumb and shout “pow!” are regarded with suspicion and not a little fear.

In short, the bar of our expectations for kids has been set higher, but the psychological and physical development of our children hasn’t changed.  “Some kids are thriving in the changing world,” notes Tyre.  “But many aren’t. What parents and teachers see is that the ones who can’t handle it are disproportionately boys.”

Father (and Mother) Knows Best

by Robert Pondiscio
September 9th, 2008

If you really want to reform education, Messrs. McCain and Obama, forget the unions, policy wonks and the business community, and heed the words of those who have skin in the game: parents.  Elizabeth Green of the New York Sun has a piece about a new group trying to inject parents’ point of view on ed reform into the campaign.

Leading the charge are two groups, Chicago-based Parents United for Responsible Education (PURE), and New York’s Class Size Matters.  “There’s a complete disconnect between what we’re being told by the politicians and the businesspeople about what we should want schools to do, and what parents want schools to do,” PURE’s executive director, Julie Woestehoff, tells the Sun. ”But frankly what parents want schools to do is better for their children. They know best.”

Naturally, there’s a manifesto in which PURE offers its own ed reform ideas. Titled “Common Sense Educational Reforms,” it differs sharply from both the “Broader Bolder” group’s and the Education Equality Project, led by Joel Klein and Al Sharpton.  The parents’ wish list includes increased parental involvement, lower class sizes, and a “rich, well-rounded curriculum.” 

Sounds good so far.  I’m all for giving parents the biggest, loudest megaphone on education issues.  They are, after all, the consumer.  On the other hand, the manifesto sounds suspiciously non-parental in its demand for kids to have ”project-based learning in a curriculum connected to their own lives and culture, with progress evaluated by high-quality, appropriate assessment tools that are primarily classroom-based.”  The group is also decidedly anti-charter schools, which will be a hard sell to parents whose kids have been spared from a life of educational neglect by charters.