<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Know Much About History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/20/dont-know-much-about-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/20/dont-know-much-about-history/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/20/dont-know-much-about-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1489#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>I just took it and got 96.97% (I missed the if taxes = spending question because I  misinterpreted the &quot;per person&quot; choice).

But while the &quot;civics&quot; questions seem pretty straightforward, the economics questions seem both more technical (what policy tools the Federal Reserve has) and more ideologically loaded (international trade leads to increased productivity).

I&#039;d also like to know more about their survey methods.  I find the &quot;elected official result&quot; very strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just took it and got 96.97% (I missed the if taxes = spending question because I  misinterpreted the &#8220;per person&#8221; choice).</p>
<p>But while the &#8220;civics&#8221; questions seem pretty straightforward, the economics questions seem both more technical (what policy tools the Federal Reserve has) and more ideologically loaded (international trade leads to increased productivity).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to know more about their survey methods.  I find the &#8220;elected official result&#8221; very strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Miller</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/20/dont-know-much-about-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1489#comment-4891</guid>
		<description>And yet the sponsor of this quiz, ISI, continues to endorse a philosophy of government that the American electorate has soundly rejected in this year&#039;s civic responsibility crash course. Funny thing about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet the sponsor of this quiz, ISI, continues to endorse a philosophy of government that the American electorate has soundly rejected in this year&#8217;s civic responsibility crash course. Funny thing about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crimson Wife</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/20/dont-know-much-about-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>Crimson Wife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1489#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>I found this year&#039;s ISI quiz to be easier than last year&#039;s. This year, I missed one question, for a score of 96.97%. Last year, I only scored 86.67% (though one was a boneheaded mistake where I read too quickly and confused Andrew JOHNson with Andrew JACKson).

The strange thing is that I can&#039;t think of any reason why I&#039;d have a greater knowledge of basic U.S. civics this year than last year. We&#039;ve been covering ancient times in history in our homeschool so it&#039;s not like I&#039;ve been brushing up on the subject. 

The question I missed was the one about the definition of a &quot;public good&quot;. I&#039;ve never formally studied economics &amp; I had narrowed the choices down to 2 possibilities but guessed wrong. I had plenty of company on that one, though- only 34.12% got the correct answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this year&#8217;s ISI quiz to be easier than last year&#8217;s. This year, I missed one question, for a score of 96.97%. Last year, I only scored 86.67% (though one was a boneheaded mistake where I read too quickly and confused Andrew JOHNson with Andrew JACKson).</p>
<p>The strange thing is that I can&#8217;t think of any reason why I&#8217;d have a greater knowledge of basic U.S. civics this year than last year. We&#8217;ve been covering ancient times in history in our homeschool so it&#8217;s not like I&#8217;ve been brushing up on the subject. </p>
<p>The question I missed was the one about the definition of a &#8220;public good&#8221;. I&#8217;ve never formally studied economics &amp; I had narrowed the choices down to 2 possibilities but guessed wrong. I had plenty of company on that one, though- only 34.12% got the correct answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
