<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Winners and Losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/26/election-winners-and-losers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/26/election-winners-and-losers/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Nash</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/26/election-winners-and-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-4937</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1521#comment-4937</guid>
		<description>Though I don&#039;t favor bloodletting our public schools on order to provide federal dollars for enrolling children in private schools, I do believe that a certain amount of experimentation is needed.

Not only that, but I also believe in more local control over schools than is really allowed by NCLB.  If charters are the only way to grab a bit of that for the future, then so be it.  Schools need local control.  I&#039;m not talking state-level here, as I am convinced that the state department in Missouri has lost it.

I think this is one of the big unknowns for the short term.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I don&#8217;t favor bloodletting our public schools on order to provide federal dollars for enrolling children in private schools, I do believe that a certain amount of experimentation is needed.</p>
<p>Not only that, but I also believe in more local control over schools than is really allowed by NCLB.  If charters are the only way to grab a bit of that for the future, then so be it.  Schools need local control.  I&#8217;m not talking state-level here, as I am convinced that the state department in Missouri has lost it.</p>
<p>I think this is one of the big unknowns for the short term.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morgan</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/11/26/election-winners-and-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-4916</link>
		<dc:creator>morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1521#comment-4916</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of charters, but I think I&#039;m okay with Ohio scaling back a little.  It seems like anybody and everybody can start a charter up there, no strings attached.  I&#039;d rather see them have consistently good charters rather than the grab bag they&#039;ve got going on.  A little quality control isn&#039;t a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of charters, but I think I&#8217;m okay with Ohio scaling back a little.  It seems like anybody and everybody can start a charter up there, no strings attached.  I&#8217;d rather see them have consistently good charters rather than the grab bag they&#8217;ve got going on.  A little quality control isn&#8217;t a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
