<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Bad Choices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/12/02/making-bad-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/12/02/making-bad-choices/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:24:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pondiscio</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/12/02/making-bad-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-4960</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pondiscio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1558#comment-4960</guid>
		<description>The idea of what&#039;s wrong with cheating is interesting.  But how about what IS cheating?  When otherwise thoughtful people insist that a command of facts and background knowledge is unimportant in the Age of Google, what&#039;s the difference between going online to look up what year the War of 1812 was fought, and downloading an entire term paper about it?  Isn&#039;t information literacy, and the ability to synthesize and manipulate information the goal?  Is the real task writing the paper?  Or having the discernment to judge three different papers on the same subject as good, better, best -- and submit the best one? 

Mind you, I don&#039;t believe this for a second.  But I can certainly imagine someone making this argument and meaning it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of what&#8217;s wrong with cheating is interesting.  But how about what IS cheating?  When otherwise thoughtful people insist that a command of facts and background knowledge is unimportant in the Age of Google, what&#8217;s the difference between going online to look up what year the War of 1812 was fought, and downloading an entire term paper about it?  Isn&#8217;t information literacy, and the ability to synthesize and manipulate information the goal?  Is the real task writing the paper?  Or having the discernment to judge three different papers on the same subject as good, better, best &#8212; and submit the best one? </p>
<p>Mind you, I don&#8217;t believe this for a second.  But I can certainly imagine someone making this argument and meaning it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlu</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2008/12/02/making-bad-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator>mlu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1558#comment-4958</guid>
		<description>Part of the problem is the belief that the basis of morality is personal choice. This is the end state of radical individualism and moral relativism.

Hold people personally responsible for what? Choice theory doesn&#039;t offer a standard, other than some sort of cost/benefit analysis of the effects of a choice on the self.

So what&#039;s wrong with cheating?

In my experience, few educators can any longer articulate a clear and coherent argument against it. Or if they can, they would  never dream of doing so out loud and in public. They will try to make it a matter of &quot;respect&quot; or &quot;tolerance&quot; which are the only moral terms they have left to work with. Goodness has been debunked and dethroned, and only self interest remains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the problem is the belief that the basis of morality is personal choice. This is the end state of radical individualism and moral relativism.</p>
<p>Hold people personally responsible for what? Choice theory doesn&#8217;t offer a standard, other than some sort of cost/benefit analysis of the effects of a choice on the self.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s wrong with cheating?</p>
<p>In my experience, few educators can any longer articulate a clear and coherent argument against it. Or if they can, they would  never dream of doing so out loud and in public. They will try to make it a matter of &#8220;respect&#8221; or &#8220;tolerance&#8221; which are the only moral terms they have left to work with. Goodness has been debunked and dethroned, and only self interest remains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
