<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Required Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/11/required-reading-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/11/required-reading-27/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:37:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/11/required-reading-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5302</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1736#comment-5302</guid>
		<description>Re: Freidman&#039;s idea...

Why not bite the bullet and have a Federal initiative to pay teachers more -- maybe even specifically math and science teachers more -- rather than the backwards &quot;tax break&quot; approach? 

To me the problem with the tax break approach is that it seem like the foot in the door to hoards of professions asking for similar exemptions.  Police, fire fighters, doctors, nurses, private school teachers (aren&#039;t they teachers too?), child care workers...

And they all really are deserving of support, but I&#039;m not sure the Federal tax code is the way to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Freidman&#8217;s idea&#8230;</p>
<p>Why not bite the bullet and have a Federal initiative to pay teachers more &#8212; maybe even specifically math and science teachers more &#8212; rather than the backwards &#8220;tax break&#8221; approach? </p>
<p>To me the problem with the tax break approach is that it seem like the foot in the door to hoards of professions asking for similar exemptions.  Police, fire fighters, doctors, nurses, private school teachers (aren&#8217;t they teachers too?), child care workers&#8230;</p>
<p>And they all really are deserving of support, but I&#8217;m not sure the Federal tax code is the way to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hoss</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/11/required-reading-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5301</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1736#comment-5301</guid>
		<description>Robert,

Let&#039;s hope not. 

Massachusetts, always the educational trendsetter, frees all retired teachers from state income tax. So with state income tax, pension contributions, and union dues not being taken out of our checks upon retirement, our monthly checks almost amount to something. It&#039;s really a pretty good deal. I hope other sates do the same for their retired teachers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope not. </p>
<p>Massachusetts, always the educational trendsetter, frees all retired teachers from state income tax. So with state income tax, pension contributions, and union dues not being taken out of our checks upon retirement, our monthly checks almost amount to something. It&#8217;s really a pretty good deal. I hope other sates do the same for their retired teachers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pondiscio</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/11/required-reading-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5300</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pondiscio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1736#comment-5300</guid>
		<description>I just saw that piece, Paul, and made a mental note to blog about it.  Here&#039;s what I was thinking:  great idea, but how long will it be before someone insists that it be tied to performance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw that piece, Paul, and made a mental note to blog about it.  Here&#8217;s what I was thinking:  great idea, but how long will it be before someone insists that it be tied to performance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hoss</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/11/required-reading-27/comment-page-1/#comment-5299</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1736#comment-5299</guid>
		<description>Also newsworthy just this morning was Tom (The World Is Flat) Friedman&#039;s column in the New York Times. Talk about thinking outside the box! HIS PROPOSAL: &quot;One of the smartest stimulus moves we could make would be to eliminate federal income taxes on all public schoolteachers so more talented people would choose these careers.&quot; 

Even though he mentions early on in his piece that his wife is a public schoolteacher in Maryland I hardly believe he compromises himself at all with his proposal. I doubt if the additional income in the Friedman household would be needed. 

I like his idea, a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also newsworthy just this morning was Tom (The World Is Flat) Friedman&#8217;s column in the New York Times. Talk about thinking outside the box! HIS PROPOSAL: &#8220;One of the smartest stimulus moves we could make would be to eliminate federal income taxes on all public schoolteachers so more talented people would choose these careers.&#8221; </p>
<p>Even though he mentions early on in his piece that his wife is a public schoolteacher in Maryland I hardly believe he compromises himself at all with his proposal. I doubt if the additional income in the Friedman household would be needed. </p>
<p>I like his idea, a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
