<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turnaround Without Turmoil, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/12/turnaround-without-turmoil-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/12/turnaround-without-turmoil-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/01/12/turnaround-without-turmoil-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5308</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1801#comment-5308</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lack of staff buy-in for any program, curriculum or flavor of reform is almost certainly its death knell, which is why leadership is so important. &lt;/i&gt;

I think you&#039;re right about this, and its one of the reason&#039;s I think Rhee&#039;s success may be limited.  I think turmoil often convinces the people who will never buy in to leave, and that may be necessary -- the &quot;if you want to make an omelette you have to break some eggs approach.&quot;  

But that approach becomes counter-productive if it drives too many potentially motivated people out.  And it become counter-productive if it doesn&#039;t know when to stop breaking eggs and start actually cooking.  Certainly so far she&#039;s highlighting her egg-breaking skills rather than her cooking skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lack of staff buy-in for any program, curriculum or flavor of reform is almost certainly its death knell, which is why leadership is so important. </i></p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right about this, and its one of the reason&#8217;s I think Rhee&#8217;s success may be limited.  I think turmoil often convinces the people who will never buy in to leave, and that may be necessary &#8212; the &#8220;if you want to make an omelette you have to break some eggs approach.&#8221;  </p>
<p>But that approach becomes counter-productive if it drives too many potentially motivated people out.  And it become counter-productive if it doesn&#8217;t know when to stop breaking eggs and start actually cooking.  Certainly so far she&#8217;s highlighting her egg-breaking skills rather than her cooking skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
