<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times For National Standards and Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/02/04/new-york-times-for-national-standards-and-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/02/04/new-york-times-for-national-standards-and-tests/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:56:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Claus</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/02/04/new-york-times-for-national-standards-and-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-5529</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1979#comment-5529</guid>
		<description>Might it not be a bit dangerous to mix the national standards question in with stimulus, per the Post&#039;s recommendation?  Given the short time frame of stimulus spending, it may actually harm the national standards movement--or other complex reforms--to yoke national standards to money that aims to provide an immediate jolt to the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might it not be a bit dangerous to mix the national standards question in with stimulus, per the Post&#8217;s recommendation?  Given the short time frame of stimulus spending, it may actually harm the national standards movement&#8211;or other complex reforms&#8211;to yoke national standards to money that aims to provide an immediate jolt to the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pondiscio</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/02/04/new-york-times-for-national-standards-and-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-5526</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pondiscio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1979#comment-5526</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d settle for a broad understanding that content knowledge and reading comprehension are inseparable, and that &quot;21st century skills&quot; don&#039;t exist in a content-free vacuum.  Give me that and you can call it whatever you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d settle for a broad understanding that content knowledge and reading comprehension are inseparable, and that &#8220;21st century skills&#8221; don&#8217;t exist in a content-free vacuum.  Give me that and you can call it whatever you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/02/04/new-york-times-for-national-standards-and-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-5525</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1979#comment-5525</guid>
		<description>Oh, national standards has always been a case of be careful what you wish for.  And if you think that you lose if it is a combination of what you want and what &quot;21st Century Skills&quot; people want, you&#039;d be much better off just quitting now and focusing on building Core Knowledge schools, because you&#039;re never in a million years going to get a national Core Knowledge curriculum.  I&#039;m not saying that as a critic -- it is simply ever, ever going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, national standards has always been a case of be careful what you wish for.  And if you think that you lose if it is a combination of what you want and what &#8220;21st Century Skills&#8221; people want, you&#8217;d be much better off just quitting now and focusing on building Core Knowledge schools, because you&#8217;re never in a million years going to get a national Core Knowledge curriculum.  I&#8217;m not saying that as a critic &#8212; it is simply ever, ever going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pondiscio</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/02/04/new-york-times-for-national-standards-and-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-5523</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pondiscio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1979#comment-5523</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Paul.  I had overlooked that one.  Here&#039;s a link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/28/AR2009012803261.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Paul.  I had overlooked that one.  Here&#8217;s a link:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/28/AR2009012803261.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/28/AR2009012803261.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hoss</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/02/04/new-york-times-for-national-standards-and-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=1979#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>Robert,

The Washington Post had a similar editorial last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>The Washington Post had a similar editorial last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
