PETA Protest Targets Elementary School

by Robert Pondiscio
March 17th, 2009

Regardless of how you feel about animal rights, this move by PETA to show up unannounced and uninvited at a Long Island elementary school to convince children that circuses mistreat their animals simply feels wrong-headed.  Protesters reportedly handed out coloring books to children leaving for the day with stickers that read, “Circuses are no fun for animals” according to Newsday.  “I just think targeting children this age is inappropriate, in my opinion,” Rodney Gilmore, Hempstead district assistant interim superintendent for elementary education tells the paper.

PETA assistant director Kristie Phelps defended the group’s actions, saying there was no harm done to children by showing up at a school to inform them about abuses endured by circus animals. She said that with the circus using “glittery” ads and ticket discounts, children and adults “deserve to know that elephants don’t naturally stand on their heads and bears don’t ride bicycles.”

Others disagree.  “These children might go home and be very anxious,” Phyllis Ohr, a clinical psychologist at Hofstra University, tells the paper. “Children are less mature in their cognitive process.”

And of course, no sooner do I write this than I realize that doing so merely rewards this kind of attention seeking, ends-justify-the-means behavior….

Arguments For and Against National Standards

by Robert Pondiscio
March 17th, 2009

Mike Smith says he ”somewhat skeptical” about national standards.  A senior adviser to Ed Secretary Arne Duncan, who favors them, Smith gave the keynote at a Library of Congress Forum on American Education in the 21st Century Monday.  Taking care to say he was speaking only for himself, not Duncan or President Obama, Smith noted his biggest concern is that “you can’t keep ideology or politics out of the ball game,” according to Ed Week’s Mary Ann Zehr at Curriculum Matters.

He put in the category of “weak” arguments the idea that the nation needs common standards because, as matters stand now, all 50 states set different proficiency levels. The argument is weak, he said, because the proficiency levels can be standardized. Another bad argument for common standards, he said, is that even though policymakers and educators acknowledge they don’t know much about what constitutes high-quality standards or assessments, they claim it would be beneficial to create a single, nationwide system.

But Smith also said standards could foster a common curriculum. “The potential to develop a common curriculum is the ‘core reason’ that he supports the advancement of common standards,” Zehr reports. 

Read the rest on Mary Ann’s blog; Ed Week’s Politics K-12 also weighs in on Smiths “eyebrow-raising” speech.

“Another Meaningless Mandate”

by Robert Pondiscio
March 17th, 2009

Not content with the Pledge of Allegiance, Oklahoma’s House has unanimously passed legislation requiring students to recite the “Oklahoma Salute” as well.  The Tulsa World’s editorial writers are apoplectic, sniffing “this is what passes for education reform in the Oklahoma legislature this year.”

You could almost hear the exasperated voices of the public school teachers: ‘Great, another meaningless mandate.’ Those same teachers may not have the resources they need to do their jobs. Their classrooms may be overcrowded and dilapidated. They may not have a hope of a raise this year, meaning their colleagues will continue to be tempted by better paying jobs across state lines. But, thank goodness, that Oklahoma House of Representatives was Johnny on the Spot to make sure that no kid misses out on his obligation to pledge allegiance to the Oklahoma flag.

The 16-word salute reads: “I salute the flag of the State of Oklahoma. Its symbols of peace unite all people.”  It won’t take long.  I do wonder, however, who’s going to pay to put state flags in every classroom in the Sooner State.