<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only Connect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/10/only-connect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/10/only-connect/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MS</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/10/only-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-6353</link>
		<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2382#comment-6353</guid>
		<description>It was a major headache in my PR days trying to accurately and adequately compare the audiences and reach of various blogs.  We basically settled on using multiple measures with a good dose of our own qualitative assessment (based on our own blog reading) to get a sense of what blog traffic really was.  It&#039;s imprecise, of course, but any measure that says you&#039;re doing a good job is a nice thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a major headache in my PR days trying to accurately and adequately compare the audiences and reach of various blogs.  We basically settled on using multiple measures with a good dose of our own qualitative assessment (based on our own blog reading) to get a sense of what blog traffic really was.  It&#8217;s imprecise, of course, but any measure that says you&#8217;re doing a good job is a nice thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pondiscio</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/10/only-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-6346</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pondiscio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2382#comment-6346</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  I confess I have a hard time understanding just why blog traffic stats should be so hard to gather since we leave a bright, shiny trail of digital breadcrumbs wherever we go.  Still, Technorati finds links WordPress doesn&#039;t and vice versa, and the almighty Google misses more than it hits. I can understand the differences in interpreting the data, but why it&#039;s so hard to gather it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  I confess I have a hard time understanding just why blog traffic stats should be so hard to gather since we leave a bright, shiny trail of digital breadcrumbs wherever we go.  Still, Technorati finds links WordPress doesn&#8217;t and vice versa, and the almighty Google misses more than it hits. I can understand the differences in interpreting the data, but why it&#8217;s so hard to gather it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Burell</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/10/only-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-6341</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Burell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2382#comment-6341</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure about this one. My old blog, which I left idle months ago to start at Change.org, is in the top 40, and the Students 2.0 blog I co-launched with students a year ago (and which has beeen belly-up and inactive for months) is in the top 50. 

It _is_ good to see a ranking based on engagement factors, instead of mere Technorati rankings.

Honestly, with tweets and facebooks and stumbles and the whole shebang, I don&#039;t think we&#039;re anywhere close to being able to map the new world....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure about this one. My old blog, which I left idle months ago to start at Change.org, is in the top 40, and the Students 2.0 blog I co-launched with students a year ago (and which has beeen belly-up and inactive for months) is in the top 50. </p>
<p>It _is_ good to see a ranking based on engagement factors, instead of mere Technorati rankings.</p>
<p>Honestly, with tweets and facebooks and stumbles and the whole shebang, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re anywhere close to being able to map the new world&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice Kielb</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/10/only-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-6337</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice Kielb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2382#comment-6337</guid>
		<description>Congrats on the Top 20 ranking!  Do you know the number of average visitors you get each day/week/month?  I&#039;ll mention the blog again to my yahoogroup, ckhomeschoolers, and see if we can&#039;t help you break into the Top 10!
Janice Kielb
List Moderator/Owner
ckhomeschoolers yahoogroup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the Top 20 ranking!  Do you know the number of average visitors you get each day/week/month?  I&#8217;ll mention the blog again to my yahoogroup, ckhomeschoolers, and see if we can&#8217;t help you break into the Top 10!<br />
Janice Kielb<br />
List Moderator/Owner<br />
ckhomeschoolers yahoogroup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
