<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Failure: It&#8217;s Not Just a Good Idea, It&#8217;s The Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/21/failure-its-not-just-a-good-idea-its-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/21/failure-its-not-just-a-good-idea-its-the-law/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SK</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/21/failure-its-not-just-a-good-idea-its-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6574</link>
		<dc:creator>SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2493#comment-6574</guid>
		<description>Can someone please explain why there is a minimum grade of 50 or any other value? Why is there s minimum grade at all? 

I grew up in India where students would regularly get 0/100 if they were absent on a test or if they did not get a single question correct or could not show any significant attempt at solving a question. Passing score was a standard 40% which was considered an abysmal performance and anything over 75% was a distinction. Scores over 90% were reserved for the brightest and best, &#039;exemplary&#039; performers. 

Of course, those were not days of high scoring standardized multiple choice tests but of open-ended questions. For such questions not only does the student need knowledge, skill, and good expression to do well, but the teacher too needs all her/his skill to mark and not just an answer sheet, or worse, a computerized scanner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please explain why there is a minimum grade of 50 or any other value? Why is there s minimum grade at all? </p>
<p>I grew up in India where students would regularly get 0/100 if they were absent on a test or if they did not get a single question correct or could not show any significant attempt at solving a question. Passing score was a standard 40% which was considered an abysmal performance and anything over 75% was a distinction. Scores over 90% were reserved for the brightest and best, &#8216;exemplary&#8217; performers. </p>
<p>Of course, those were not days of high scoring standardized multiple choice tests but of open-ended questions. For such questions not only does the student need knowledge, skill, and good expression to do well, but the teacher too needs all her/his skill to mark and not just an answer sheet, or worse, a computerized scanner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben F</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/21/failure-its-not-just-a-good-idea-its-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6510</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2493#comment-6510</guid>
		<description>So much time and energy wasted on these grading disputes....  What really counts is whether or not the student learned something, right?  I think I&#039;d be happier if grading were taken out of the individual teachers&#039; hands and pegged to students&#039; performance on state-wide or nation-wide standardized end-of-course exams.  This would insulate the schools and teachers from haggling...the proof would be in the pudding.  Of course this would require a state-wide or nation-wide curriculum and well-crafted tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much time and energy wasted on these grading disputes&#8230;.  What really counts is whether or not the student learned something, right?  I think I&#8217;d be happier if grading were taken out of the individual teachers&#8217; hands and pegged to students&#8217; performance on state-wide or nation-wide standardized end-of-course exams.  This would insulate the schools and teachers from haggling&#8230;the proof would be in the pudding.  Of course this would require a state-wide or nation-wide curriculum and well-crafted tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obi-Wandreas</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/21/failure-its-not-just-a-good-idea-its-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6509</link>
		<dc:creator>Obi-Wandreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2493#comment-6509</guid>
		<description>In my district, the minimum grade is 50, while the passing grade is 65.  The result is that if you have 2 quarterly grades of 80, you can do absolutely nothing for the other two quarters.

The other result is that the kid who earns 49% gets the same grade as the one who earns 2.38%.  Sure, you can add the comment &quot;Actual grade is lower than reported,&quot; but parents can&#039;t see &lt;i&gt;how much&lt;/i&gt; lower.

For the most part, districts are more concerned with keeping retentions down than they are with actual education.  As in life, no consequences means no effort.  If you don&#039;t allow people to fail, you make it impossible to succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my district, the minimum grade is 50, while the passing grade is 65.  The result is that if you have 2 quarterly grades of 80, you can do absolutely nothing for the other two quarters.</p>
<p>The other result is that the kid who earns 49% gets the same grade as the one who earns 2.38%.  Sure, you can add the comment &#8220;Actual grade is lower than reported,&#8221; but parents can&#8217;t see <i>how much</i> lower.</p>
<p>For the most part, districts are more concerned with keeping retentions down than they are with actual education.  As in life, no consequences means no effort.  If you don&#8217;t allow people to fail, you make it impossible to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crimson Wife</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/04/21/failure-its-not-just-a-good-idea-its-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6507</link>
		<dc:creator>Crimson Wife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2493#comment-6507</guid>
		<description>I understand the sentiment behind having minimum grades as there&#039;s a difference between a kid who tries but still fails and a kid who simply does not try at all. But there&#039;s got to be a better way to deal with the situation. Perhaps allowing the student a second chance to master the material through the use of make-up assignments? It&#039;s tricky, though, since that practice might be seen as unfair by the students who got it right the first time. I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s the best answer to this dilemma...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the sentiment behind having minimum grades as there&#8217;s a difference between a kid who tries but still fails and a kid who simply does not try at all. But there&#8217;s got to be a better way to deal with the situation. Perhaps allowing the student a second chance to master the material through the use of make-up assignments? It&#8217;s tricky, though, since that practice might be seen as unfair by the students who got it right the first time. I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s the best answer to this dilemma&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
