<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Year of the Bad Teacher&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/06/23/the-year-of-the-bad-teacher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/06/23/the-year-of-the-bad-teacher/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:59:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GGW</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/06/23/the-year-of-the-bad-teacher/comment-page-1/#comment-7148</link>
		<dc:creator>GGW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2886#comment-7148</guid>
		<description>Another issue is: what is a teacher supposed to do when a kid has a rotten parent or home situation (but it doesn&#039;t reach the point of legal abuse)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another issue is: what is a teacher supposed to do when a kid has a rotten parent or home situation (but it doesn&#8217;t reach the point of legal abuse)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2009/06/23/the-year-of-the-bad-teacher/comment-page-1/#comment-7123</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=2886#comment-7123</guid>
		<description>In someways it would be easier to measure teaching quality if the criteria were not humiliating students rather than raising test scores.

But if such a thing is proposed, I can easily imagine the WSJ railing against wishy-washy educators who care more about self-esteem than data-verified results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In someways it would be easier to measure teaching quality if the criteria were not humiliating students rather than raising test scores.</p>
<p>But if such a thing is proposed, I can easily imagine the WSJ railing against wishy-washy educators who care more about self-esteem than data-verified results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
