1. The check is in the mail.
2. No, officer, I have not been drinking
3. Copying stuff off the Internet counts as plagiarism? I had no idea!
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jul | Sep » | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
1. The check is in the mail.
2. No, officer, I have not been drinking
3. Copying stuff off the Internet counts as plagiarism? I had no idea!
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Indeed!
Comment by Tom Hoffman — August 2, 2010 @ 9:35 pm
I occasionally run into this problem in my college teaching but it’s really not such a big problem. You just tell kids what constitutes cheating. A well crafted paragraph or two suffices.
Comment by Dan Willingham — August 3, 2010 @ 4:18 am
Good to hear, Dan. I didn’t see too much of it either in my limited experience as an adjunct professor. On the other hand, I didn’t spend too much time trying to ferret it out, either. I assumed students’ paper were there own unless I had reason not to. What I found surprising about the Times piece was not the allegations of plagiarism, but the idea that there are students in colleges anywhere who are so blissfully unaware — sorry, who have had their relationship to originality so altered by digital media — as to not regard lifting text as plagiarism.
Comment by Robert Pondiscio — August 3, 2010 @ 7:53 am