“Why Knowledge Counts More Than Skill”

by Core Knowledge Foundation
February 1st, 2017

Our blog post title above is in quotation marks because it is quoted from an article hot off the online press. Here are three quotations from that article:

  • To help students master nonfiction reading, we must design instruction that builds their background knowledge.
  • Prior knowledge affects comprehension—in many cases, far more than generic “reading skills” do.
  • The ability to build knowledge by reading and to learn from texts is a crucial driver of student success. … It is crucial to equity because many students’ lack of background knowledge causes them to fall further and further behind.

The source? “How Knowledge Powers Reading,” in the February 2017 issue of Educational Leadership, published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). The author? Doug Lemov, author of Teach Like a Champion, the book about effective teaching that has grown into a professional development movement.

If you’re familiar with Core Knowledge, then Lemov’s statements will strike you as eminently sound. Indeed, Core Knowledge founder E. D. Hirsch, Jr. has been making the case for the importance of prior knowledge and the need for knowledge-based reading instruction since the publication of Cultural Literacy in 1987.

Lemov’s ASCD article offers guidance to teachers asked to incorporate more nonfiction in their reading instruction. He notes that “many language arts teachers approach nonfiction structurally. They perceive it as a genre and strive to help their students develop an overarching structural knowledge of that genre. They reason that, if students understand how information is presented, they will understand what they read.”

LC15

Lemov clearly explains that “how information is presented” is less important than what students know, since the text assumes (as all texts do) prior background knowledge. Lemov goes on to offer practical suggestions for “ways to weave prior knowledge into our students’ reading of nonfiction throughout the process of engaging them with texts.” (For more teaching strategies, see Lemov’s 2016 book from which his ASCD article is derived, Reading Reconsidered: A Practical Guide to Rigorous Literacy Instruction.)

One suggestion: “Ask knowledge-based questions.” Lemov is aware that many teachers have been “trained to think of such questions as second-rate or ‘not our job’”—after all, they’re at the bottom of Bloom’s taxonomy, mere facts as opposed to the higher-order skills of making inferences or interpreting motivations, right? Not quite, says Lemov. Through thoughtful examples, he shows how well-crafted “fact-based questions are actually surprisingly rigorous.”

Moreover, says Lemov, “if we don’t ask any such questions, we may be tacitly socializing students to believe that facts are irrelevant. By asking some fact-based questions, we can chip away at the knowledge deficit and teach our students how to unlock knowledge from what they read.”

Demonstrating by example that facts are relevant. Chipping away at the knowledge deficit. Filling in gaps in prior knowledge. These, we agree, are truly ways to teach like a champion.

3 Comments »

  1. Finland is dropping all separate academic subjects, so History is going bye-bye there, while it is only dying as it tried to morph into civics here.

    Comment by Will Fitzhugh — February 1, 2017 @ 3:06 pm

  2. I notice Mr. Lemov, in his rediscovery of knowledge in the schools, fails to credit E.D. Hirsch, but perhaps that is just a name he does not “know”—a real shame. But I guess it is better to lay personal claim to the rediscovery of knowledge than to try to keep it out of the classroom forever, right? And he knows enough to borrow the baseball knowledge example…

    Comment by Will Fitzhugh — February 1, 2017 @ 3:29 pm

  3. “… Counts More Than …”?
    As long as we and others think in terms of a “winner” here, there will be little gain. They are both important and feed off each other alternately. Just as knowing a few reasons for learning math facts is a help in solving numerical problems.
    Of course, there’s the classic question of why we have seasons. Fourth graders all knew the answer was “indirect rays from the sun”. To illustrate what they meant, the kids drew the “direct rays” as straight lines from the sun to the Earth hitting in several places. The “indirect rays” were drawn off into space; then they were redirected to land on the Earth.
    Were they expressing knowledge or skill?

    Comment by Ewaldoh — February 2, 2017 @ 2:36 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

While the Core Knowledge Foundation wants to hear from readers of this blog, it reserves the right to not post comments online and to edit them for content and appropriateness.