Archive for the 'Education News' Category

Two More Black Eyes for 21st Century Skills

“I am trying NOT to write off the 21st century skills movement as a sham, but its leaders don’t make it easy,” writes the Washington Post’s Jay Mathews this morning on his Class Struggle blog. 

Mathew raises a skeptical eyebrow at a new book by Bernie Trilling and Charles Fadel, 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times.  The pair are Silicon Valley corporate honchos and members of the board of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills.  He was hoping the book would “prove wrong those of us who could see nothing in this movement but a lot of buzz words and jargon describing principles of teaching and learning that have been with us for many decades.”   Keep hope alive, Uncle Jay.

I sense Trilling and Fadel are smart tech guys who just don’t know much about real schools with real kids who have difficulty learning how to read, write and do math. The perspective of much of the book is from thousands of feet up, as if the authors were on a jetliner flying into San Francisco’s airport. They can’t see the scuffed floors and trash-strewn playground of a public middle school in Oakland, but can use their laptops to write nice sentences about how the six emerging principles of the movement are “vision, coordination, official policy, leadership, learning technology and teacher learning.”

Meanwhile Common Core continues to treat P21 like its personal chew toy.  In his book review, Mathews sees “no sign that the Partnership, based in Tucson and Washington, D.C., is using its revenue to buy beach mansions in Bali.  However, Lynne Munson and James Elias parse a list of 230 organizations that signed on to P21’s National Action Agenda on 21st Century Skills and conclude it’s “a laundry list of vendors who undoubtedly either profit from or would like to profit from P21’s work.”  The list is also significant, they say, for who is not on it.

Just 11 of P21’s 13 member states signed.  The holdouts were New Jersey and Massachusetts, where P21 has encountered very strong resistance.  A number of the mostly for-profit heavyweights that sit on P21’s Strategic Council also were absent, including Ford Motor Company, Lenovo, Nellie Mae, Verizon, Walt Disney, and CPB.

“The closer we look,” Munson and Elias conclude, “the more P21’s unproven educational program appears to be just another mechanism for selling more stuff to schools.”

Hold On, Mr. President

“From the moment students enter a school, the most important factor in their success is not the color of their skin or the income of their parents. It’s the person standing at the front of the classroom,” said President Obama in a recent speech.  Linda Perlstein, off to a strong start on her new ed blog, talks to researchers who explain why the President is wrong.

Raising the Dropout Age

In an attempt to cut the state’s dropout rate in half, Massachusetts will consider requiring students to stay in school until age 18.  Under current state law students can legally drop out at 16, but students as young as 14 can withdraw for medical reasons or to work. 
Taking  the advice of a state commission, Governor Deval Patrick will introduce legislation to raise the compulsory school age and create “an array of programs aimed at preventing students from dropping out and reaching out to those who have,” the Boston Globe reports. 

Some strategies recommended by the commission include hiring case managers to make the school experience more personal for these students, creating internships so students clearly see the connection between the classroom and potential careers, and using standardized test scores and other data to gauge, as early as elementary school, whether a student runs the risk of not finishing high school.

I have to confess I’ve always been ambivalent about proposals to raise the age for compulsory attendance in school.  It’s important to reduce the number of dropouts, but too often we blur the lines between the credential (a high school diploma) and what it putatively represents (an educated graduate).  Like extending the school day and year-round schooling, doing more of what’s not working is never a good idea.  A focus on raising the numbers of graduates also leads to abused schemes like credit recovery.  I’d rather focus on increasing the quality of the graduates rather than trusting that merely handing a kid a diploma solves all future problems.   Handing out empty diplomas solves one problem only:  the problem of low graduation rates.

Keeping Up With the Joanneses

Most evenings, I read the papers, go through newsletters, scan my various Google Alerts, and set aside a handful of articles that strike me as worth blogging about.  Then one of two things inevitably happen the next morning: 1) work gets in the way, or 2) I find out Joanne Jacobs has already blogged about them.

So here are a couple of blog-worthy stories that…oh, hell…just go to her site and read them.

Required Reading

Linda Perstein, former Washington Post writer and author of the standout ed book, Tested, has launched an ed blog.  The Educated Reporter launched Monday, a year and a half after Perlstein was named public editor for the Education Writers Association.  What to expect?

My job is to help improve coverage of education, through direct coaching of journalists and broader commentary.  So a blog makes all kinds of sense. I find myself taking up issues on EWA’s internal listserve and in our newsletter that I realize people outside the organization might like to hear about. When I have a story idea to suggest, or when an oft-repeated myth needs debunking—no, states do NOT build prisons based on third-grade reading levels—or when a report comes out I know reporters will be calling about, I’ll have a place to share.

Welcome to a real pro.

Do NAEP Scores Have Legs at the Polls?

In New York, 80 percent of 8th graders met the state’s standards in math this year, up from 59 percent two years ago.  But the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results released yesterday paint a different picture.  Only 34 percent of the state’s 8th graders are considered proficient, a modest increase from 2007 levels.  NAEP scores for the Empire State’s 4th graders actually declined, while the percent passing the state’s own test went up.  This renewed charges that New York is making itself look good by lowering standards.   Diane Ravitch puts it plainly: ”The fabulous ‘gains’ reported last spring, we now know, were based on dumbed-down tests and dubious scoring of the tests in Albany,” she writes in today’s New York Post.

On the one hand, there is nothing new here, and New York is not alone in this boat.  Disconnects between the results for NAEP and state tests have been well known and much discussed for years.  The open question is whether state tests have now been sufficiently discredited in the minds of voters to make them a political liability.  The even larger question is whether the failure of test-driven accountability to move the needle will feed voter resentment, turning testing into a legitimate campaign issue in state and local races this November and beyond.

“There’s a palpable backlash against testing across much of the great American middle class,” Fordham’s Checker Finn recently observed.  ”We need to face the fact that testing, particularly high-stakes uses of test results for students and teachers alike, are deeply unpopular outside policymaker circles and could well lose rather than gain political traction in coming years.” 

The first test case may come in New York City, where Mayor Michael Bloomberg is up for a third term and campaigning on his education record. The New York Times points out this morning how the NAEP results are ”sharply contradicting the results of state-administered tests that showed record gains.”  NAEP results for the city itself will not be available for several weeks, but Bloomberg’s opponent, Democrat Bill Thompson, is attempting to make political hay nonetheless.  A spokesperson quoted in the New York Times today calls the Bloomberg administration the “Madoff of the American education system” and a “national disgrace.”  Bloomberg has a commanding lead in the polls, but his opponent is clearly trying to turn the Mayor’s record on education, a perceived strength, into a liability.  Will it play?  A Marist poll last Spring showed New York voters approved of the Mayor’s handling of the schools by a 51-to-41 percent margin.  It bears watching to what degree, if any, the testing issue moves those numbers.

No Child Left Behind, it has been widely observed, is a “tainted brand.”  But is “accountability” still a winner at the polls?  What NAEP seems to be telling us is that we’ve had a whole lot of test-driven accountability (and a whole lot of education spending) without a whole lot of results.  That said, it’s not an easy issue for voters to wrap their heads around.  I suspect it will be easier and more efficacious to get voters cranky about their kids education being reduced to a joyless grind.  “Prep and test schooling” does not roll as trippingly off the tongue as “tax and spend liberal” but it probably resonates more with voters than trying to explain cut scores.

Catholic Schools Crisis

Faced with student attrition and a financial crisis, Catholic schools have to reinvent themselves.   “The biggest threat that urban Catholic schools face is nostalgia,” John Eriksen, a Catholic schools superintendent from Paterson, New Jersey tells Time Magazine. ”We’ve been running these schools in a way that might have worked 30 or 40 years ago but doesn’t work now,” he says.  Catholic schools have been reinventing themselves by converting to charters, and forging partnerships with philanthropists and foundations in an effort to stem their decline, the magazine notes.

Nearly 1 in 5 Catholic schools in the U.S. has closed its doors this decade. To non-Catholics, this may not appear to be something worth worrying about. But parochial schools are one of the largest (if not the largest) alternatives to the American public-education system, and their steady decline inordinately affects urban low-income minorities who would otherwise be left at the mercy of public schools that have proven incapable of educating them.

At National Review Online, Sol Stern says the Time piece is “a welcome look at the plight of urban Catholic schools.” But Stern argues their decline has been “exacerbated by public-school reform schemes that have been oversold to the public and, ironically, cheered by many conservatives and businesspeople.”

In New York City, for example, the Catholic schools are competing for teachers with a public school system that now has unheard-of sums of money to spend. In just the past seven years, the city’s education budget has increased from $12.7 billion to $22 billion. Teacher salaries have risen 43 percent across the board in six years, passing the $100,000 top-salary threshold for the first time. Ten years ago, the gap between the city’s top salaries for Catholic-school teachers and public-school teachers was around $28,000. It’s now $50,000. Catholic schools find themselves stuck on a treadmill in which they either have to raise salaries even higher — and pass the costs on to students’ families — or lose more teachers to the public schools.

The Time piece notwithstanding, it’s mystifing at how little attention Catholic schools get given their long history of effectively educating poor urban children.  According to the National Catholic Education Association, 99% of Catholic secondary school students graduate, with 97% going on to college. And scale?  Reform darling KIPP runs 66 public schools serving just over 16,000 students.   Catholic schools serving 25 times more children have closed down this decade.   Over a thousand schools, serving nearly half a million students, nearly all of whom, one assumes, went back into public schools, which have failed to produce anything like the results posted by Catholic schools.

Good Schools “Avoid False Choices”

Whole language or phonics?  Skills or content?  Equity or excellence? In visits to successful schools, Karin Chenoweth has “been struck by how free they are from the frustrating controversies other schools get mired in.”   Chenoweth who works for the Education Trust, writes  in Education Week  that high-achieving schools with significant populations of low-income children ”tend to avoid questions about the philosophy of reading instruction. Rather, they approach the issue with what I consider a cheerful empiricism.” 

One such school is PS/MS 124, a Core Knowledge school and a past winner of Ed Trust’s “Dispelling the Myth” award.  As part of the New York City school system, “it is expected to teach its students a district curriculum that emphasizes skills rather than a set body of content,” writes Chenoweth.  But principal Valarie Lewis, noticed “teachers would teach skills, but if [the children] didn’t have background knowledge, it didn’t stick.”

She and the school’s then-principal, Elain Thompson, brought the Core Knowledge program to the school. Its curriculum, developed in part by E.D. Hirsch Jr., focuses on providing students with a great deal of background knowledge, from nursery rhymes to Newton’s Laws. ‘Teachers still need to teach the skills,’ said Judy Lefante, the school’s Core Knowledge coordinator, ‘but we’ve worked hard through professional development to make sure they teach skills through content.’ Skills such as making inferences, drawing conclusions, and separating facts from opinion, for example, are all worked on within the science and social studies content areas.”

Student achievement at PS/MS 124 is “almost indistinguishable from that of wealthy, white schools,” Chenoweth notes, “despite the fact that more than 80 percent of its mostly African-American, Latino, and South Asian students qualify for free lunches,” 

“The point is this,” she concludes. “Arguments that for too long have fostered false dichotomies, pitting one practice against another, can be resolved—but only if educators have as their clear goal ensuring that all their students become educated citizens, and then focus closely on what it takes to help them reach that goal.”

Making Report Card Comments Meaningful

What does it mean if a child “can systematically describes the relative locations of objects or people using positional language”?  In plain English, it means the child can tell you if she is first or last in line.  So why not just say so?  That’s the impetus behind a move in Toronto to allow teachers to put report card comments in simple language instead of “education bafflegab.”

“Teachers should strive to use language that parents will understand and should avoid language that simply repeats what curriculum documents state,” says the proposed policy, which the city school board will take up this week.  The new policy’s goal is to make report card comments “meaningful” to students and parents.

No, It’s Not

“Some school administrators argue that it is difficult to distinguish innocent pranks and mistakes from more serious threats, and that the policies must be strict to protect students.”

From a New York Times article  a six-year-old boy who suspended from school for 45 days after bringing “a camping utensil that can serve as a knife, fork and spoon to school.”   He was reportedly excited about joining the Cub Scouts that he wanted to use it to eat lunch.  However the utensil violated the school district’s zero-tolerance policy on weapons and the 1st grader “faces 45 days in the district’s reform school,” the paper reports.

A commenter on the Times message board nails it:  “A little common sense would go a long ways in this life. What would be wrong with telling him that’s nice, you’ll keep it in your desk and your Mom can come pick it up, and don’t bring it again.” 

Gee, ya think?