“I am trying NOT to write off the 21st century skills movement as a sham, but its leaders don’t make it easy,” writes the Washington Post’s Jay Mathews this morning on his Class Struggle blog.
Mathew raises a skeptical eyebrow at a new book by Bernie Trilling and Charles Fadel, 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. The pair are Silicon Valley corporate honchos and members of the board of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. He was hoping the book would “prove wrong those of us who could see nothing in this movement but a lot of buzz words and jargon describing principles of teaching and learning that have been with us for many decades.” Keep hope alive, Uncle Jay.
I sense Trilling and Fadel are smart tech guys who just don’t know much about real schools with real kids who have difficulty learning how to read, write and do math. The perspective of much of the book is from thousands of feet up, as if the authors were on a jetliner flying into San Francisco’s airport. They can’t see the scuffed floors and trash-strewn playground of a public middle school in Oakland, but can use their laptops to write nice sentences about how the six emerging principles of the movement are “vision, coordination, official policy, leadership, learning technology and teacher learning.”
Meanwhile Common Core continues to treat P21 like its personal chew toy. In his book review, Mathews sees “no sign that the Partnership, based in Tucson and Washington, D.C., is using its revenue to buy beach mansions in Bali. However, Lynne Munson and James Elias parse a list of 230 organizations that signed on to P21’s National Action Agenda on 21st Century Skills and conclude it’s “a laundry list of vendors who undoubtedly either profit from or would like to profit from P21’s work.” The list is also significant, they say, for who is not on it.
Just 11 of P21’s 13 member states signed. The holdouts were New Jersey and Massachusetts, where P21 has encountered very strong resistance. A number of the mostly for-profit heavyweights that sit on P21’s Strategic Council also were absent, including Ford Motor Company, Lenovo, Nellie Mae, Verizon, Walt Disney, and CPB.
“The closer we look,” Munson and Elias conclude, “the more P21’s unproven educational program appears to be just another mechanism for selling more stuff to schools.”


Making Report Card Comments Meaningful
What does it mean if a child “can systematically describes the relative locations of objects or people using positional language”? In plain English, it means the child can tell you if she is first or last in line. So why not just say so? That’s the impetus behind a move in Toronto to allow teachers to put report card comments in simple language instead of “education bafflegab.”
“Teachers should strive to use language that parents will understand and should avoid language that simply repeats what curriculum documents state,” says the proposed policy, which the city school board will take up this week. The new policy’s goal is to make report card comments “meaningful” to students and parents.