by Robert Pondiscio
June 9th, 2009
Tags: curricular content, early childhood education, New America Foundation, Sara Mead
Posted in Curriculum, Literacy | 3 Comments »
This blog has long noted the strange indifference of the ed policy community to curriculum. In wonk world it’s all about structures, and all will be well as long as a child has a great teacher, held accountable by testing, incentivized by merit pay, and serving at the pleasure of a principal in a charter school (or variations on that theme). Curriculum? The invisible hand will presumably see to that.
The New America Foundation’s early ed specialist, Sara Mead, is a notable exception. Writing last week about the Administration’s proposed $300 million Early Literacy Grants, Mead praised the program, but registered concern that its “emphasis on reading comprehension could lead many schools to devote excessive time to teaching so-called ‘comprehension strategies.’
As we’ve written here before, and as Daniel Willingham compellingly argues here, the best way to strengthen children’s ability to comprehend what they read is to expose them to rich and diverse content across various domains, so that they have the general knowledge to easily understand written passages on a wide variety of topics. That requires less time spent drilling comprehension strategies, and more time reading a variety of texts (especially non-fiction), and studying science, social studies, music, and the arts. If this program can help school districts move in that direction—while also maintaining a focus on strengthening students’ decoding skills and helping them gain fluency and vocabulary—that could be a really good thing.
Mead, who has clearly invested considerable time on the mechanics of teaching and learning, was at it again yesterday on her Early Ed Watch blog. Commenting on last week’s Common Core report linking high academic achievement in other countries with a rich, broad curriculum, she highlighted Lynne Munson’s observation that the content of a student’s education has a greater influence on his level of achievement than does delivery or accountability systems.
As research by both the American Federation of Teachers and the Thomas B. Fordham Institute has shown, the early elementary school years are home to some of the weakest areas in existing state standards, and the early grades curriculum — particularly for low-income students — is too often a “content-free zone.” What can we learn from other countries about improving children’s access to high-quality, rich content — in a full range of academic subjects, including music and the arts — in the early grades?
Perhaps there should be a conference of ed policy types who are as concerned as Sara Mead about early elementary curriculum. We can book the washroom of a 737 for the meeting.
by Alice Wiggins
April 22nd, 2009
Tags: early childhood education, Preschool, standards, standards alignment
Posted in No category | 4 Comments »
So far this week, I’ve discussed two ways to improve U.S. early childhood education—changing the way we evaluate preschools (and preschool teachers) and establishing clear and specific preschool learning standards. The third item on my wish list is aligning preschool and elementary school standards.
Creating a seamless PreK to elementary school system is also the No. 1 item on the “to do” list of the National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE). In a paper titled Promoting Quality in PreK-Grade 3 Classrooms by Dr. Mariana Haynes, NASBE’s research director, argued for aligning not just standards, but curricula, assessment and teaching practices for Pre-K through grade three, to reflect what research tells us about learning environments on children’s developmental outcomes. “This is an important foundational step to creating the infrastructure for a coherent, evidence-based early learning system,” Haynes wrote. “States may want to examine how to create incentives for school districts and early education providers to partner in building a seamless prekindergarten through grade three system,” she concluded.
A New America Foundation report by Kristie Kauerz also makes a strong argument for advancing the alignment of PK through grade 3. Lack of availability of high-quality preschool for all children (we’ll talk about this later this week!) coupled with the absence of alignment between PK and subsequent grades results in classes that include some children who have the background knowledge and academic gains for preschool and some children who do not. As a result, Kauerz notes “teacher must focus on those children who do not have the relevant and necessary cognitive or social skills, thereby being forced to slow and level down the curriculum and pedagogy in order not to leave behind less well prepared children.” The result? Children who arrived well prepared are often hindered in their continued progress.
Kauerz goes on to cite a study of elementary school in California that “analyzed why some schools score substantially better on the state’s academic performance index than other schools with similar students. Practices found to be associated with higher performance included school-wide instructional consistency within grades, curricular alignment from grade-to-grade, and classroom instruction guided by state academic standards (Williams, Kirst, & Haertel, 2005).”
It’s safe to say that one unambiguous victory of the standards-based education movement has been a general rise in expectations, especially in schools serving low-SES children. Clear and specific preschool learning standards would ensure that children transition more smoothly to kindergarten bringing with them social skills and foundational skills and knowledge for ongoing educational achievement. Aligning those standards with a state’s existing K-8 standards would be better still.
by Robert Pondiscio
April 20th, 2009
Tags: early childhood education
Posted in Core Knowledge | 1 Comment »
We’re pleased to welcome a new voice to the blog this week. Alice Wiggins, Early Childhood Program Director of the Core Knowledge Foundation, directs early childhood programs including the development and management of preschool curriculum, materials, and professional development. Before joining CK in 2007, Alice served as the Associate Director of the University of Virginia Preschool Language and Literacy Lab.
She is the author of Preschoolers at Play: Building Language and Literacy through Dramatic Play, and contributing author to Scaffolding With Storybooks: A Guide for Enhancing Young Children’s Language and Literacy Achievement, and Assessment in Emergent Literacy.
This week marks the observation of the National Association for the Education of Young Children’s Week of the Young Child. Alice will blog on five specific recommendations to improve early childhood education, starting with a call for clear and specific early childhood learning standards later today.
by Robert Pondiscio
July 30th, 2008
Tags: Canada, early childhood education, Mexico, parenting, Preschool, social services
Posted in Education Practice, Research and Reports | No Comments »
Poor Mexican children who participate in a government program with extensive family services are further ahead in kindergarten than the average Canadian kid, according to new research.
Mexican authorities in 1990 implemented a system of programs called CENDI (the Spanish acronym for Centres for Early Childhood Development) in Monterrey, an industrial city roughly the size of Greater Toronto, that provides community supports to low-income households from the time of pregnancy through to preschool. The programs are similar to what Canadian early childhood researcher Dr. Fraser Mustard has long been advocating in Canada, the Toronto Star reports.
“You can’t dump the whole responsibility (for childhood development) on families,” says Mustard, who advocates creating community “hubs” – ideally in local schools – where they can obtain nutrition and health advice from professionals, take part in parenting programs and involve their tots in programs. “Mustard says that way, parents get the support they need to do a better job, and problems can be caught and treated early on,” notes the paper.
The research will undoubtedly be used to bolster the argument of those who favor a broader social services role for schools. It’s hard to imagine broad comments about dumping the whole responsibility for raising children on families, however, playing well in the U.S.
by Robert Pondiscio
June 12th, 2008
Tags: early childhood education, Higher Education
Posted in Research and Reports | No Comments »
Want to know who will have the toughest time passing high school exit exams? Look at 4th grade test scores, grades and classroom behavior. A study Public Policy Institute of California, reported in the L.A. Times, will come as no surprise to 4th grade teachers:
The findings, based on an extensive study of student achievement in San Diego schools, call into question the effectiveness of aiming significant efforts and tens of millions of dollars at struggling high school seniors and older students to help them pass the exam.
The report recommends “moving a portion of these tutoring dollars to struggling students in earlier grades — when the students are still in school — could be a wise choice. An ounce of prevention could indeed be worth a pound of cure.”
Makes perfect sense, intervene early, and the earlier the better. I would wager real money that I could predict today which of my 5th graders are likely to graduate high school with a fairly high degree of accuracy based on their elementary school performance, and in most cases, the die was cast before they walked into my room. The battle is won and lost at an early age.
Update: Joanne Jacobs, who has probably forgotten more about education in California than I’ll ever know, is also on this.