Education, The Economy, and Talking Dogs

by Robert Pondiscio
December 31st, 2009

If schools produce well-educated and skilled graduates, the nation’s economy will grow.  That belief has been at the very heart of school reform since the late-1970s.  Yet the belief is suspect, Larry Cuban points out, ”because even economists, the ones who are expected to know, cannot point with assurance at precisely which factors cause economic growth.”

In 2004, a group of top economists published the Barcelona Development Agenda announcing in it that ‘there is no single set of policies that can be guaranteed to ignite sustained growth.’ Not that economists are shy about identifying factors that explain economic growth. It is just that there are too many explanations. One recent survey found 145 separate factors linked to economic growth, yet most of these factors could not be isolated as ones that caused heightened growth. Yes, formal education was one of the 145 factors.

Cuban writes on his blog that no one cites the example of Switzerland, which is one of Europe’s wealthiest countries, “yet has the lowest university attendance and graduation rates among OECD countries.”  Similarly, he points out, several developing African nations including Angola, Zambia, Ghana have made major investments in education and increased their graduation rates with little discernible economic impact.   The Stanford education professor cites ventriloquist Todd Oliver and Irving, his talking dog, as a “harmless shared illusion,” since no one really believes the dog can talk.  But the idea that education exists to grow the economy, he writes, is not a harmless illusion.

There are many reasons to have strong schools in a society beyond, but including, economic ones. Although they hardly get mentioned by policymakers save in throwaway lines at graduation ceremonies, expanded literacy in service of developing an engaged citizenry who, in fulfilling their civic obligations, build better communities and live moral lives are, and have been, historic reasons for investing tax dollars in American schools.

“Historically, schools have sought to serve society and the individual in many ways beyond job preparation,” Cuban writes.  “Not now.”

Will Run World For Food

by Robert Pondiscio
December 15th, 2008

Pity poor Harvard.  The Boston Globe notes that big losses in the university’s massive endowment have “blown in a new age of austerity across the campus.”

“The cuts are big and small. There are the hiring freezes that run to the core of the university’s mission. But there are also the cookies and soft drinks eliminated from small faculty gatherings. A noon-hour seminar series that used to provide catered lunches from local ethnic restaurants will now serve pizza.  Faculty members, who are not slated for raises next year, will be expected to pitch in on clerical work.

Harvard’s faculty is worried about “losing out on a generation of young academic talent, as hiring has become virtually impossible,” the Globe notes.  Reality check: Harvard’s endowment is still $30 billion, by far the largest of any university.  If they can’t afford top talent, who can?

Are You Smarter Than a Sub Prime Lender?

by Robert Pondiscio
November 24th, 2008

The housing and credit crunch has claimed a high-profile victim in the education world.  Georgia’s State Schools Superintendant Kathy Cox and her husband have filed for personal bankruptcy.  Cox’s husband is a homebuilder and the couple is more than $3 million in debt, mostly due to debts associated with the business. 

It’s a case off no good deed goes unpunished: Just two months ago, Cox won $1 million on the game show “Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?” She said she would donate her winnings to a pair of schools for the deaf and one for the blind, and still plans to make good on that pledge despite the bankruptcy filing. 

A statement issue by the Georgia schools chief over the weekend says “this filing does not affect my ability to perform the duties of my job as state superintendent of schools.”

C is for Crisis

by Robert Pondiscio
October 7th, 2008

A survey of 500 U.S. teenagers finds that almost 70 percent fear an “immediate negative impact” on the security of their families, the Washington Post reports.  

“There are no secrets in families,” said Stanley Greenspan, professor of child psychiatry and pediatrics at George Washington University, who has started to see the economic anxiety show up in his practice. “Younger kids tend to be all-or-nothing thinkers. So a healthy 8-year-old is more likely to worry in a more extreme way than an adult.”

“What’s an economic crisis?” my ten-year-old daughter asked me on the way to the bus yesterday, echoing the phrase she had heard on the radio.